East Side Bank v. Columbus Tanning Co.

32 A. 539, 170 Pa. 1, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1355
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 18, 1895·No. Appeal, No. 165·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Fell,

The appeal in this case presents two questions. The first relates to the validity of the judgment under which the defendant’s property was sold and the right of the appellant to raise the question in the proceeding before the auditor; the second to the rights of the creditors of a corporation in the distribution of the fund arising from the sale of its property by the sheriff. Both questions were correctly decided by the learned judge of the common pleas. The second arises out of a state of facts substantially the same as those in Roy’s Appeal, No. 113, January term, 1895, in which the opinion of the court has been filed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

East Side Bank v. Columbus Tanning Co., 32 A. 539, 170 Pa. 1, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1355 (Pa. 1895).

32 A. 539 (East Side Bank v. Columbus Tanning Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Home Savings Fund v. King
173 A. 891 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Silverstein v. Cohen
12 Pa. D. & C. 218 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1928)
Read's Estate
2 Pa. D. & C. 135 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1922)
International Coal Mining Co. v. Pennsylvania R.
152 F. 554 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1907)
Margo v. Pennsylvania Railroad
62 A. 1081 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
In re Naylor Mfg. Co.
135 F. 206 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1905)
Smith v. Altoona & Philipsburg Connecting Railroad
37 A. 930 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)