East Side Bank v. Columbus Tanning Co.
This text of 32 A. 539 (East Side Bank v. Columbus Tanning Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The appeal in this case presents two questions. The first relates to the validity of the judgment under which the defendant’s property was sold and the right of the appellant to raise the question in the proceeding before the auditor; the second to the rights of the creditors of a corporation in the distribution of the fund arising from the sale of its property by the sheriff. Both questions were correctly decided by the learned judge of the common pleas. The second arises out of a state of facts substantially the same as those in Roy’s Appeal, No. 113, January term, 1895, in which the opinion of the court has been filed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 A. 539, 170 Pa. 1, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/east-side-bank-v-columbus-tanning-co-pa-1895.