East River Savings Bank v. 671 Prospect Avenue Holding Corp.

254 A.D. 845, 6 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7924

Opinion

Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — O’Malley, Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Glennon and Cohn, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and deny motion for summary judgment, on the ground that the issue as to whether the personal property in dispute is subject to the mortgage lien is one of fact which must await determination upon the trial of the action. (Manufacturers Trust Company v. Peck-Schwartz Realty Corporation, 277 N. Y. 283; Brooklyn Savings Bank v. Ann-Gold Realty Corporation, 243 App. Div. 703; New York Title Co. v. Menreal Corp., 242 id. 711; Prudential Insurance Co. v. Sanford Real Estate Corp., 246 id. 567.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

East River Savings Bank v. 671 Prospect Avenue Holding Corp., 254 A.D. 845, 6 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

254 A.D. 845 (East River Savings Bank v. 671 Prospect Avenue Holding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Peck-Schwartz Realty Corp.
14 N.E.2d 70 (New York Court of Appeals, 1938)
Brooklyn Savings Bank v. Ann-Gold Realty Corp.
243 A.D. 703 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)