East Okeechobee Palms, LLC v. Kellam

Eleventh Circuit

East Okeechobee Palms, LLC v. Kellam

637 F. App'x 568

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 8, 2016·No. No. 15-14385·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The District Court on February 23, 2015, entered an order dismissing appellants’ amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Doc. 47. On August 28, 2015, the court denied appellants’ motion for relief filed pursuant to Rules 59(a)(2) and (e) and Rules 60(b)(3) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Doc. 57. Appellants appeal both orders. Doc. 58.

We find no error in the District Court’s order dismissing that amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction or its order denying relief under Rules 59 and 60.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The District Court on February 23, 2015, entered an order dismissing appellants’ amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Doc. 47. On August 28, 2015, the court denied appellants’ motion for relief filed pursuant to Rules 59(a)(2) and (e) and Rules 60(b)(3) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Doc. 57. Appellants appeal both orders. Doc. 58.

We find no error in the District Court’s order dismissing that amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction or its order denying relief under Rules 59 and 60.

AFFIRMED.

East Okeechobee Palms, LLC v. Kellam, 637 F. App'x 568 (11th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

637 F. App'x 568 (East Okeechobee Palms, LLC v. Kellam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.