East Okeechobee Palms, LLC v. Kellam

Eleventh Circuit

East Okeechobee Palms, LLC v. Kellam

637 F. App'x 568

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 8, 2016

DocketNo. 15-14385

StatusPublished

This text of 637 F. App'x 568 (East Okeechobee Palms, LLC v. Kellam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

East Okeechobee Palms, LLC v. Kellam, 637 F. App'x 568 (11th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The District Court on February 23, 2015, entered an order dismissing appellants’ amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Doc. 47. On August 28, 2015, the court denied appellants’ motion for relief filed pursuant to Rules 59(a)(2) and (e) and Rules 60(b)(3) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Doc. 57. Appellants appeal both orders. Doc. 58.

We find no error in the District Court’s order dismissing that amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction or its order denying relief under Rules 59 and 60.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The District Court on February 23, 2015, entered an order dismissing appellants’ amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Doc. 47. On August 28, 2015, the court denied appellants’ motion for relief filed pursuant to Rules 59(a)(2) and (e) and Rules 60(b)(3) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Doc. 57. Appellants appeal both orders. Doc. 58.

We find no error in the District Court’s order dismissing that amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction or its order denying relief under Rules 59 and 60.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

637 F. App'x 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/east-okeechobee-palms-llc-v-kellam-ca11-2016.