East New York Savings Bank v. Dickey & Lemberg Co.

258 A.D. 889, 16 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7457
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 4, 1939·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action brought to foreclose a mortgage on real property, in which appellant-mortgagor set up a defense and counterclaim based upon an alleged agreement by the mortgagee to devote the proceeds of a fire insurance policy to the repair of the mortgaged premises and the payment of arrears of interest and taxes, judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. The evidence supports the finding of the trial court that no agreement was made of the character alleged in the answer. The mortgagee was entitled under section 254, subdivision 4, of the Real Property Law, to retain the insurance moneys in reduction of the principal of the mortgage. Present —• Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

East New York Savings Bank v. Dickey & Lemberg Co., 258 A.D. 889, 16 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7457 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

258 A.D. 889 (East New York Savings Bank v. Dickey & Lemberg Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Emigrant Funding Corp. v. Kensington Realty Group Corp.
2019 NY Slip Op 9255 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)