East New York Savings Bank v. 305 Convent Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

East New York Savings Bank v. 305 Convent Realty Corp.

197 A.D.2d 415, 602 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9629

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 14, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 197 A.D.2d 415 (East New York Savings Bank v. 305 Convent Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

East New York Savings Bank v. 305 Convent Realty Corp., 197 A.D.2d 415, 602 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9629 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered on or about December 24, 1992, which, inter alia, authorized the receiver to borrow funds from 305 Convent Avenue Tenants Association to pay for various necessary expenses to maintain the premises, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s order was appropriate in light of the existing "special circumstances”—the need to cure the dangerous conditions of lack of heat, hot water and necessary services. (Title Guar. & Trust Co. v Abrams, 248 App Div 595; Long Is. City Sav. & Loan Assn. v Bertsman Bldg. Corp., 123 AD2d 840.)

We have considered all other claims and find them to be meritless. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered on or about December 24, 1992, which, inter alia, authorized the receiver to borrow funds from 305 Convent Avenue Tenants Association to pay for various necessary expenses to maintain the premises, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s order was appropriate in light of the existing "special circumstances”—the need to cure the dangerous conditions of lack of heat, hot water and necessary services. (Title Guar. & Trust Co. v Abrams, 248 App Div 595; Long Is. City Sav. & Loan Assn. v Bertsman Bldg. Corp., 123 AD2d 840.)

We have considered all other claims and find them to be meritless. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 A.D.2d 415, 602 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/east-new-york-savings-bank-v-305-convent-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack