East Fordham De LLC v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n

2017 NY Slip Op 407, 146 A.D.3d 610, 44 N.Y.S.3d 903
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 19, 2017·No. 260551/14 -5897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered on or about August 12, 2015, which, inter alia, directed defendants to close on the subject refinancing transaction based upon the value of the property as established by the parties’ *611 completed appraisals, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the order vacated.

In deciding plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, the court erred in reaching a determination on the merits of the ultimate relief sought (see Residential Bd. of Mgrs. of Columbia Condominium v Alden, 178 AD2d 121 [1st Dept 1991]). Issues of fact exist, including whether defendants waived their right to contest the method used by the parties’ appraisers to determine the value of the property.

Concur— Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Feinman, Gische and Kahn, JJ.

Motion to strike portions of briefs and for sanctions denied. Cross motion to file supplemental record and for sanctions granted as to the supplemental record, and otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

East Fordham De LLC v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n, 2017 NY Slip Op 407, 146 A.D.3d 610, 44 N.Y.S.3d 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 407 (East Fordham De LLC v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

East Fordham DE LLC v. U.S. Bank Natl. Assn.
2019 NY Slip Op 2047 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)