East Erie Commercial R. v. Denial
66 F.2d 555, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 2710
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 11, 1933·No. No. 5065·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
In the final analysis, this is an appeal from an order of the court below granting a new trial. The trial judge felt he had tried the case under a mistaken view of a Supreme Court decision and therefore felt constrained to grant a new trial. See Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co., 287 U. S. 474, 53 S. Ct. 252, 77 L. Ed. 439. It is thus seen there is no final judgment from which an appeal lies. Consequently it is dismissed, and the cause remanded for due procedure.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
East Erie Commercial R. v. Denial, 66 F.2d 555, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 2710 (3d Cir. 1933).
66 F.2d 555 (East Erie Commercial R. v. Denial) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Long v. Davis
169 F.2d 982 (Ninth Circuit, 1948)
De Grazia v. Anderson
58 A.2d 306 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1948)
Phillips v. Marvin's Credit, Inc.
35 A.2d 825 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1944)
Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Malmskold
115 F.2d 786 (Ninth Circuit, 1940)
Frank Mercantile Corp. v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
115 F.2d 496 (Third Circuit, 1940)