East Coast Lumber & Surety Co. v. Tacinelli

197 So. 446, 143 Fla. 793, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1289
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 23, 1940·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The controlling question involved in this case, which is a mortgage foreclosure suit, is that of priorities between the lien of mortgage and the alleged statutory materialman’s lien.

The question was one to be determined upon the probative force, weight and credibility to be given the evidence.

*794 The decree of the chancellor is amply supported by the evidence and is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford, J., concur. Thomas and Chapman, J. J., agree to conclusion. Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

East Coast Lumber & Surety Co. v. Tacinelli, 197 So. 446, 143 Fla. 793, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1289 (Fla. 1940).

197 So. 446 (East Coast Lumber & Surety Co. v. Tacinelli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miami National Bank v. Citation Homes, Inc.
157 So. 2d 155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)