East Carolina Railway v. McGuire

194 N.C. 788
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 14, 1927
StatusPublished

This text of 194 N.C. 788 (East Carolina Railway v. McGuire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
East Carolina Railway v. McGuire, 194 N.C. 788 (N.C. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

This is an appeal from a refusal to set aside a judgment on tbe ground of “mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect.” C. S., 600.

Tbe judge, upon competent evidence, found facts from wbicb be concluded, first, tbat tbe movant bad failed to show any excusable neglect; and, second, tbat no meritorious defense bad been made to appear. There is nothing on tbe record to warrant a reversal of tbe judgment. Taylor v. Gentry, 192 N. c., 503; cahoon v. Brinkley, 176 N. C., 5; Norton v. McLaurin, 125 N. C., 185.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Norton v. . McLaurin
34 S.E. 269 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)
Cahoon v. Brinkley
176 N.C. 5 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 N.C. 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/east-carolina-railway-v-mcguire-nc-1927.