East Carolina Railway v. McGuire
194 N.C. 788
Opinion
This is an appeal from a refusal to set aside a judgment on tbe ground of “mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect.” C. S., 600.
Tbe judge, upon competent evidence, found facts from wbicb be concluded, first, tbat tbe movant bad failed to show any excusable neglect; and, second, tbat no meritorious defense bad been made to appear. There is nothing on tbe record to warrant a reversal of tbe judgment. Taylor v. Gentry, 192 N. c., 503; cahoon v. Brinkley, 176 N. C., 5; Norton v. McLaurin, 125 N. C., 185.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
East Carolina Railway v. McGuire, 194 N.C. 788 (N.C. 1927).
194 N.C. 788 (East Carolina Railway v. McGuire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Norton v. . McLaurin
34 S.E. 269 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)
Cahoon v. Brinkley
176 N.C. 5 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1918)