East 70th Street Corp. v. Argus Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

East 70th Street Corp. v. Argus Construction Corp.

193 A.D.2d 563, 598 N.Y.S.2d 209

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 193 A.D.2d 563 (East 70th Street Corp. v. Argus Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

East 70th Street Corp. v. Argus Construction Corp., 193 A.D.2d 563, 598 N.Y.S.2d 209 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Williams, J.), entered on or about September 16, 1992, which discharged the mechanic’s liens filed against petitioner’s property, and order, same court and Justice, entered October 13, 1992, which denied defendant’s motion to renew an application for a stay, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The renovation contract which was entered into between defendant and Bren, the proprietary lessee, was unenforceable by reason of defendant’s failure to possess a home improve[564]*564ment license as mandated by Administrative Code of the City of New York § 20-387 (see, Mortise v 55 Liberty Owners Corp., 102 AD2d 719, affd 63 NY2d 743) and defendant cannot avoid the strong policy considerations underlying that Administrative Code provision by seeking to recover its unpaid balance from the cooperative corporation with whom it has no contractual, or other, relationship. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Williams, J.), entered on or about September 16, 1992, which discharged the mechanic’s liens filed against petitioner’s property, and order, same court and Justice, entered October 13, 1992, which denied defendant’s motion to renew an application for a stay, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The renovation contract which was entered into between defendant and Bren, the proprietary lessee, was unenforceable by reason of defendant’s failure to possess a home improve[564]*564ment license as mandated by Administrative Code of the City of New York § 20-387 (see, Mortise v 55 Liberty Owners Corp., 102 AD2d 719, affd 63 NY2d 743) and defendant cannot avoid the strong policy considerations underlying that Administrative Code provision by seeking to recover its unpaid balance from the cooperative corporation with whom it has no contractual, or other, relationship. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 563, 598 N.Y.S.2d 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/east-70th-street-corp-v-argus-construction-corp-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack