East 55th Street Joint Venture v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

East 55th Street Joint Venture v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal

162 A.D.2d 305, 556 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7437

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 21, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a CPLR article 78 proceeding transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Kenneth Shorter, J.), entered May 31, 1989, the determination of respondent Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) dated December 28, 1988, which denied petitioner’s petition for administrative review of DHCR’s July 15, 1986 order fixing rent for the subject apartment, unanimously confirmed and the petition dismissed, without costs.

In this rent overcharge proceeding, DHCR recalculated the rent for the subject apartment using an alternative method because the landlord did not file a complete rental history. The rental history provided belatedly by the landlord consisted, in part, of affidavits obtained from former tenants for the specific purpose of this litigation and a purported "worksheet” of questionable origin. DHCR properly exercised its discretion in finding these documents to be without probative value (see, Matter of Kraus Mgt. v State of N. Y., Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 137 AD2d 689, 690-691). Accordingly, DHCR’s determination had a rational basis, for which this court will not substitute its own view (see, Matter of Bambeck v State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 129 AD2d 51, 54, Iv denied 70 NY2d 615).

We have reviewed the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Carro, Milonas and Rosenberger, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a CPLR article 78 proceeding transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Kenneth Shorter, J.), entered May 31, 1989, the determination of respondent Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) dated December 28, 1988, which denied petitioner’s petition for administrative review of DHCR’s July 15, 1986 order fixing rent for the subject apartment, unanimously confirmed and the petition dismissed, without costs.

In this rent overcharge proceeding, DHCR recalculated the rent for the subject apartment using an alternative method because the landlord did not file a complete rental history. The rental history provided belatedly by the landlord consisted, in part, of affidavits obtained from former tenants for the specific purpose of this litigation and a purported "worksheet” of questionable origin. DHCR properly exercised its discretion in finding these documents to be without probative value (see, Matter of Kraus Mgt. v State of N. Y., Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 137 AD2d 689, 690-691). Accordingly, DHCR’s determination had a rational basis, for which this court will not substitute its own view (see, Matter of Bambeck v State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 129 AD2d 51, 54, Iv denied 70 NY2d 615).

We have reviewed the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Carro, Milonas and Rosenberger, JJ.

East 55th Street Joint Venture v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal, 162 A.D.2d 305, 556 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7437 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

162 A.D.2d 305 (East 55th Street Joint Venture v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related