Eason, Watkins & Co. v. Johnson

69 Miss. 371
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1891·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The right of the landlord to recover from one to whom the agricultural products grown on the demised premises have been sold by the tenant, is not affected by the want of knowledge by the purchaser of the fact that the rent is due and unpaid. The lien exists by virtue of a positive law, and the rule of caveat emptor applies to all who purchase from the tenant. Newman v. Bank of Greenville, 66 Miss., 323.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eason, Watkins & Co. v. Johnson, 69 Miss. 371 (Mich. 1891).

69 Miss. 371 (Eason, Watkins & Co. v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. Sklar
555 So. 2d 1024 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1990)
Cavins v. Planters Bank & Trust Co.
187 F.2d 906 (Fifth Circuit, 1951)
Peets & Norman Co. v. Baker
48 So. 898 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1909)
Powell v. Smith
74 Miss. 142 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1896)
Applewhite v. Nelms
71 Miss. 482 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1893)
Warren & Montgomery Bros. v. Jones
70 Miss. 202 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1892)