Eason v. U.S. Emer. Fleet Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Eason v. U.S. Emer. Fleet Corp.

89 Pa. Super. 485, 1925 Pa. Super. LEXIS 11

DecidedOctober 14, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 89 Pa. Super. 485 (Eason v. U.S. Emer. Fleet Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eason v. U.S. Emer. Fleet Corp., 89 Pa. Super. 485, 1925 Pa. Super. LEXIS 11 (Pa. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Argued October 14, 1924. The assignments of error violate several of the rules of this court in substantial respects. We have, however, gone into the record, which we also notice is not printed in accordance with our rules, and find that in a jury trial plaintiff had a verdict for $69.44; that subsequently, on appropriate motion, the court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $416.66, pursuant to Moffitt v. U.S. Shipping Board E.F. Corp., 80 Pa. Super. 81, and Max v. U.S. Shipping Board E.F. Corp., 80 Pa. Super. 86, cases in which this court considered the same rules concerning employees' leave with pay, involved in this case.

For violation of our rules and pursuant to Rule 57, the appeal is quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Argued October 14, 1924. The assignments of error violate several of the rules of this court in substantial respects. We have, however, gone into the record, which we also notice is not printed in accordance with our rules, and find that in a jury trial plaintiff had a verdict for $69.44; that subsequently, on appropriate motion, the court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $416.66, pursuant to Moffitt v. U.S. Shipping Board E.F. Corp., 80 Pa. Super. 81, and Max v. U.S. Shipping Board E.F. Corp., 80 Pa. Super. 86, cases in which this court considered the same rules concerning employees' leave with pay, involved in this case.

For violation of our rules and pursuant to Rule 57, the appeal is quashed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 Pa. Super. 485, 1925 Pa. Super. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eason-v-us-emer-fleet-corp-pasuperct-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack