Eason v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

89 Pa. Super. 485
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 9, 1925·No. Appeal No. 47·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The assignments of error violate several of the rules of this court in substantial respects. "We have, however, gone into the record, which we also notice is not printed in accordance with our rules, and find that in a jury trial plaintiff had a verdict for $69:44; that subsequently, on appropriate motion, the court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $416.66, pursuant to Moffitt v. U. S. Shipping Board E. F. Corp., 80 Pa. Superior Ct. 81, and Max v. U. S. Shipping Board E. F. Corp., 80 Pa. Superior Ct. 86, cases in which this court considered the same rules concerning employees’ leave with pay, involved in this case.

For violation of our rules and pursuant to- Buie 57, the appeal is- quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eason v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 89 Pa. Super. 485 (Pa. Ct. App. 1925).

89 Pa. Super. 485 (Eason v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moffitt v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
80 Pa. Super. 81 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Max v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
80 Pa. Super. 86 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)