Eason v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Eason v. State

136 S.E. 336, 36 Ga. App. 296, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 29

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 11, 1927

Docket17742

StatusPublished

This text of 136 S.E. 336 (Eason v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eason v. State, 136 S.E. 336, 36 Ga. App. 296, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 29 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. In the light of the facts of the case and the entire charge of the court, the excerpts from the charge, excepted to, were not error for any reason assigned. The chai’ge was full and fair and correctly presented to the jury the issues in the case and the appropriate law thereon.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. In the light of the facts of the case and the entire charge of the court, the excerpts from the charge, excepted to, were not error for any reason assigned. The chai’ge was full and fair and correctly presented to the jury the issues in the case and the appropriate law thereon.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S.E. 336, 36 Ga. App. 296, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eason-v-state-gactapp-1927.