Eason v. State
120 S.E. 22, 31 Ga. App. 172, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 814
This text of 120 S.E. 22 (Eason v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Eason v. State, 120 S.E. 22, 31 Ga. App. 172, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 814 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
Opinion
The defendant complains that her conviction was not authorized by the evidence. The evidence was conflicting, but, the jury having believed the evidence for the State, showing her guilt, and the trial judge having approved the verdict, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is
Affvrmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
120 S.E. 22, 31 Ga. App. 172, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eason-v-state-gactapp-1923.