Eason v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided December 4, 2023·No. 18-0406V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: November 7, 2023

************************* TRAVIS EASON, * PUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 18-406V * v. * Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Damages Award; Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”). * Respondent. * * *************************

Milton Clay Ragsdale, Ragsdale LLC, Birmingham, AL, for petitioner. Colleen Clemons Hartley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES BASED ON PROFFER1

On March 19, 2018, Travis Eason (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Act” or “the Program”), 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq. (2018).2 Petitioner alleged that he suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) as the result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination he received on September 12, 2012. Petition at 1-2 (ECF No. 1). On February 28, 2022, the undersigned issued a ruling finding Petitioner entitled to compensation. Fact Finding and Ruling on Entitlement dated Feb. 28, 2022 (ECF No. 77).

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2018). All citations in this Decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa. On November 6, 2023, Respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation (“Proffer”), attached hereto as Appendix A. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Proffer at 2. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards Petitioner:

(1) A lump sum payment of $780,569.20, for all damages, representing compensation for life care expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($31,175.22), lost earnings ($544,495.00), pain and suffering ($170,000.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($34,898.98), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Travis Eason.

(2) An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in the Proffer at section II.B.

Proffer at 3. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which Petitioner is entitled under § 15(a). Id.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT herewith.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) TRAVIS EASON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 18-406V v. ) Special Master Dorsey ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) )

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On March 19, 2018, Travis Eason (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under

the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act”

or “Act”), alleging that he suffered from Guillain-Barré Syndrome as a result of receiving the

influenza (“flu”) on September 12, 2012. Petition at ¶ 2. On February 28, 2022, Special Master

Dorsey issued an entitlement decision in favor of petitioner. ECF No. 77. Respondent now

proffers the following regarding the amount of compensation to be awarded. 1

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

Respondent engaged life care planner Laura E. Fox, MSN, BSN, RN, CNS, CLCP, and

petitioner engaged Lynne Trautwein, MSN, RN, to provide an estimation of petitioner’s future

vaccine-injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine injury” is as

described in the Special Master’s February 28, 2022, Ruling on Entitlement. All items of

1 The parties have no objection to the amount of the proffered award of damages. However, respondent reserves his right, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(f), to seek review of the Special Master’s February 28, 2022, ruling on entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to an award under the Vaccine Act. This right accrues following the issuance of the damages decision. compensation identified in the life care plan are supported by the evidence, and are illustrated by

the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Travis Eason, attached hereto as Tab

A. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded all items of compensation set forth in

the life care plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A. Petitioner agrees.

B. Lost Earnings

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, Travis Eason has suffered past

loss of earnings and will suffer future loss of earnings as a result of his vaccine-related injury.

Therefore, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded lost earnings as provided under

the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Respondent proffers that the appropriate award

for Travis Eason’s lost earnings is $544,495.00. Petitioner agrees.

C. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $170,000.00 in actual and

projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and

suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner

agrees.

D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents his expenditure of past unreimbursable

expenses related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be

awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $34,898.98. Petitioner agrees.

2 II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eason v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2023).

Eason v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Eason v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(f)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a