Eason v. Hudson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Eason v. Hudson

498 So. 2d 836, 1986 Miss. LEXIS 2872

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 3, 1986

DocketNo. 56928

StatusPublished

This text of 498 So. 2d 836 (Eason v. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eason v. Hudson, 498 So. 2d 836, 1986 Miss. LEXIS 2872 (Mich. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PRATHER, Justice,

for the Court:

By decree of adverse possession the Chancellor of Newton County awarded title of 8.83 acres to appellees and assessed actual damages for a fence and trees destroyed by appellant. An appeal and cross-appeal have been filed by the parties. The [837]*837Court affirms the direct appeal, the cross-appeal is reversed and rendered in part and remanded in part.

The record clearly shows that since 1952 appellees have been in actual, open notorious, hostile, exclusive and continuous possession of the disputed tract located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, Township 6, Range 13 in Newton County. In 1984 appellant asserted his claim to the property by bulldozing a fence and tree line one-half mile in length. Errors assigned on appeal are without merit. Two points raised on cross-appeal will be addressed here.

The chancellor, under the authority of Miss.Code Ann. § 95-5-3, awarded a statutory penalty of five hundred twenty-five dollars ($525.00) or fifteen dollars ($15.00) per tree for thirty-five (35) oak, gum and pine trees destroyed by Eason. In 1981 § 95-5-3 was amended to raise the penalty from fifteen dollars ($15.00) to fifty-five dollars ($55.00) per tree. We reverse and render this statutory penalty award to increase that award from five hundred twenty-five dollars ($525.00) to one thousand nine hundred twenty-five dollars ($1,925.00) under the amended statute.

Appellees also seek remand to determine the value of the property in dispute and accurately assess the fifteen percent (15%) penalty prescribed by Miss.Code Ann. § 11-3-23 (Supp.1985). See Johnson v. Black, 480 So.2d 519 (Miss.1985); Old Security Cas. Ins. v. Clemmer, 458 So.2d 732 (Miss.1984); Walters v. Inexco Oil Co., 440 So.2d 268 (Miss.1983); Peoples Bank and Trust v. L. & T. Developers, 437 So.2d 7 (Miss.1983); Hart v. Catoe, 393 So.2d 1346 (Miss.1981).

This Court remands this case to the Chancery Court of Newton County to determine the value of the disputed land at issue for purposes of assessment of the above penalty.

AFFIRMED ON DIRECT APPEAL; REVERSED ON CROSS-APPEAL AND RENDERED IN PART AND REMANDED IN PART.

WALKER, C.J., ROY NOBLE LEE and HAWKINS, P.JJ., and DAN M. LEE, ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN, ANDERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRATHER, Justice,

for the Court:

By decree of adverse possession the Chancellor of Newton County awarded title of 8.83 acres to appellees and assessed actual damages for a fence and trees destroyed by appellant. An appeal and cross-appeal have been filed by the parties. The [837]*837Court affirms the direct appeal, the cross-appeal is reversed and rendered in part and remanded in part.

The record clearly shows that since 1952 appellees have been in actual, open notorious, hostile, exclusive and continuous possession of the disputed tract located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, Township 6, Range 13 in Newton County. In 1984 appellant asserted his claim to the property by bulldozing a fence and tree line one-half mile in length. Errors assigned on appeal are without merit. Two points raised on cross-appeal will be addressed here.

The chancellor, under the authority of Miss.Code Ann. § 95-5-3, awarded a statutory penalty of five hundred twenty-five dollars ($525.00) or fifteen dollars ($15.00) per tree for thirty-five (35) oak, gum and pine trees destroyed by Eason. In 1981 § 95-5-3 was amended to raise the penalty from fifteen dollars ($15.00) to fifty-five dollars ($55.00) per tree. We reverse and render this statutory penalty award to increase that award from five hundred twenty-five dollars ($525.00) to one thousand nine hundred twenty-five dollars ($1,925.00) under the amended statute.

Appellees also seek remand to determine the value of the property in dispute and accurately assess the fifteen percent (15%) penalty prescribed by Miss.Code Ann. § 11-3-23 (Supp.1985). See Johnson v. Black, 480 So.2d 519 (Miss.1985); Old Security Cas. Ins. v. Clemmer, 458 So.2d 732 (Miss.1984); Walters v. Inexco Oil Co., 440 So.2d 268 (Miss.1983); Peoples Bank and Trust v. L. & T. Developers, 437 So.2d 7 (Miss.1983); Hart v. Catoe, 393 So.2d 1346 (Miss.1981).

This Court remands this case to the Chancery Court of Newton County to determine the value of the disputed land at issue for purposes of assessment of the above penalty.

AFFIRMED ON DIRECT APPEAL; REVERSED ON CROSS-APPEAL AND RENDERED IN PART AND REMANDED IN PART.

WALKER, C.J., ROY NOBLE LEE and HAWKINS, P.JJ., and DAN M. LEE, ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN, ANDERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

498 So. 2d 836, 1986 Miss. LEXIS 2872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eason-v-hudson-miss-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack