Eason v. Howard T. Herber Middle School

250 A.D.2d 807, 671 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6026
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 26, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated June 3, 1997, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see generally, Hollinger v Chestnut Ridge Racquet Corp., 227 AD2d 380). Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment was timely (see, CPLR 3212 [a]; Phoenix Garden Rest. v Chu, 245 AD2d 164; Auger v State of New York, 236 AD2d 177). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eason v. Howard T. Herber Middle School, 250 A.D.2d 807, 671 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6026 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

250 A.D.2d 807 (Eason v. Howard T. Herber Middle School) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gentles v. New York City Transit Authority
275 A.D.2d 388 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)