Eason v. Eason

Supreme Court of Alabama

Eason v. Eason

103 So. 918, 212 Ala. 694

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMarch 26, 1925

Docket7 Div. 527.

StatusPublished

This text of 103 So. 918 (Eason v. Eason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eason v. Eason, 103 So. 918, 212 Ala. 694 (Ala. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

SAYRE, J.

The appeal is upon exceptions taken by the ward, appellant, on the final settlement of his guardian, appellee. After deliberate examination of the evidence, we feel convinced that appellant paid fairly his way at least by his labor on appellee’s farm, and that appellee’s charge of $120 per annum for support should not have been allowed. Further than this we are unwilling to go, in derogation of the conclusions of fact reached in the trial court. No error appears in the other rulings excepted to. The judgment will be reversed, and the cause remanded to the probate court, with direction to enter judgment in accordance with this opinion. Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAYRE, J.

The appeal is upon exceptions taken by the ward, appellant, on the final settlement of his guardian, appellee. After deliberate examination of the evidence, we feel convinced that appellant paid fairly his way at least by his labor on appellee’s farm, and that appellee’s charge of $120 per annum for support should not have been allowed. Further than this we are unwilling to go, in derogation of the conclusions of fact reached in the trial court. No error appears in the other rulings excepted to. The judgment will be reversed, and the cause remanded to the probate court, with direction to enter judgment in accordance with this opinion. Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 So. 918, 212 Ala. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eason-v-eason-ala-1925.