Easley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Easley v. State

568 S.W.3d 86

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 26, 2019

DocketWD 81112

StatusPublished

This text of 568 S.W.3d 86 (Easley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Easley v. State, 568 S.W.3d 86 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam:

Aaron J. Easley appeals the denial after an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief which claimed he was denied due process when the sentencing court permitted the state to play, over defense counsel's objection, a video about his victim's life which included hearsay, and which Easley claims was prejudicial to the imposition of sentence. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

Aaron J. Easley appeals the denial after an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief which claimed he was denied due process when the sentencing court permitted the state to play, over defense counsel's objection, a video about his victim's life which included hearsay, and which Easley claims was prejudicial to the imposition of sentence. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 S.W.3d 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/easley-v-state-moctapp-2019.