Easley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Easley v. State

155 S.E. 82, 41 Ga. App. 838

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 15, 1930

Docket20655

StatusPublished

This text of 155 S.E. 82 (Easley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Easley v. State, 155 S.E. 82, 41 Ga. App. 838 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The ground of the motion for a now trial, complaining of the failure of the court to instruct the jury upon the law of circumstantial evidence, is disapproved by the trial court, and therefore can not be considered by this court.

2. The other alleged errors, both of commission and of omission, in the charge of the court, when considered' in the light of the charge as a whole and the facts of the ease, show no cause for a reversal of the judgment.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error. Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eonewr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The ground of the motion for a now trial, complaining of the failure of the court to instruct the jury upon the law of circumstantial evidence, is disapproved by the trial court, and therefore can not be considered by this court.

2. The other alleged errors, both of commission and of omission, in the charge of the court, when considered' in the light of the charge as a whole and the facts of the ease, show no cause for a reversal of the judgment.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error. Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eonewr.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 S.E. 82, 41 Ga. App. 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/easley-v-state-gactapp-1930.