Easley v. State

689 So. 2d 1167, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1821, 1997 WL 91278
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Easley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 755 So. 2d 692
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 5, 1997·No. No. 94-04587·Published

Opinion

FRANK, Judge.

Melissa Sue Easley has appealed from her convictions and sentences for first degree murder and attempted first degree murder. Her attack on her conviction has no merit. The court did err, however, in imposing consecutive minimum mandatory sentences. A minimum mandatory sentence contained in an enhancement statute such as section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1995), for use of a firearm, cannot be imposed consecutively to the statutorily required twenty-five-year minimum mandatory for the first degree murder conviction. Boler v. State, 678 So.2d 319 (Fla.1996). On remand, then, the court , must correct the sentences to reflect that the minimiun mandatory portions of the sentences are concurrent.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Easley v. State, 689 So. 2d 1167, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1821, 1997 WL 91278 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

689 So. 2d 1167 (Easley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boler v. State
678 So. 2d 319 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)