Easley v. Prewitt

37 Mo. 361
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided February 15, 1866·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The demurrer in this case was improperly sustained. A petition is not demurrable because it asks a judgment not [363] warranted by the averments ; nor is its character always determined by the relief it prays for. The court may grant any relief consistent with the case made and embraced within the issues. (R. C. 1855, p. 1280, § 12; Northcraft v. Martin, 28 Mo. 469.) The petition stated a good cause of action on the agreement; but if the plaintiff wishes to foreclose his lien on the building, he ought to amend his petition,and set out the condition and the breach.

The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Judge Holmes concurs; Judge Lovelace absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Easley v. Prewitt, 37 Mo. 361 (Mo. 1866).

37 Mo. 361 (Easley v. Prewitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carthage National Bank v. Poole
141 S.W. 729 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1911)
City of Pilot Grove v. McCormick
56 Mo. App. 530 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1894)
Baker v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
34 Mo. App. 98 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)
Comings v. Hannibal & Central Missoum Railroad
48 Mo. 512 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1871)