Easley v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
Opinion
[Cite as Easley v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2011-Ohio-4849.]
Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us
ANDRE EASLEY Case No. 2010-01221
Plaintiff Judge Joseph T. Clark
v. Magistrate Matthew C. Rambo
DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION JUDGMENT ENTRY
Defendant
{¶1} On May 16, 2011, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant. {¶2} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: “A party may file written objections to a magistrate’s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i).” No objections were filed. {¶3} The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the magistrate’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.
_____________________________________ JOSEPH T. CLARK Judge Case No. 2010-01221 -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY
cc:
Douglas R. Folkert Richard F. Swope Emily M. Simmons 6480 East Main Street, Suite 102 Assistant Attorneys General Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068 150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130
MR/dms
Filed July 25, 2011 To S.C. reporter September 22, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2011 Ohio 4849 (Easley v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.