Home/New York Supreme Court/Easley v. New York State Thruway Authority

Easley v. New York State Thruway Authority

208 Misc. 705, 146 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1955 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2978
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 7, 1955
StatusPublished

This text of 208 Misc. 705 (Easley v. New York State Thruway Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Easley v. New York State Thruway Authority, 208 Misc. 705, 146 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1955 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2978 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1955).

Opinion

Taylor, J.

The enactment by the Legislature of section 361-b of the Public Authorities Law (L. 1954, ch. 517, eff. April 7, 1954) which conferred exclusive jurisdiction on the Court of Claims to hear and determine claims against the defendant for its tortious acts and those of its agents was a valid exercise of legislative power. (Matter of Brown v. Board of Trustees of Town of Hamptonburg, School Dist. No. 4, 303 N. Y. 484; People ex rel. Crane v. Hahlo, 228 N. Y. 309; Smith v. State of New York, 227 N. Y. 405; People ex rel. Swift v. Luce, 204 N. Y. 478; [706]*706Wood & Selick v. Ball, 190 N. Y. 217; MacMullen v. City of Middletown, 187 N. Y. 37; Decker v. Canzoneri, 256 App. Div. 68; Pantess v. Saratoga Springs Auth., 255 App. Div. 426; Ross v. State of New York, 186 App. Div. 156; Matter of Hicka, 180 Misc. 173; 81 C. J. S., States, § 215; N. Y. Const., Art. VI, § 1.) The motions to dismiss the complaints are accordingly granted, without costs.

Submit orders.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People Ex Rel. Swift v. . Luce
97 N.E. 850 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)
People Ex Rel. Crane v. . Hahlo
127 N.E. 402 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
Smith v. . State of New York
125 N.E. 841 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
Wood Selick v. . Ball
83 N.E. 31 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)
MacMullen v. . City of Middletown
79 N.E. 863 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)
Ross v. State
186 A.D. 156 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
Pantess v. Saratoga Springs Authority
255 A.D. 426 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Decker v. Canzoneri
256 A.D. 68 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
In re Hicka
180 Misc. 173 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)
Brown v. Board of Trustees
104 N.E.2d 866 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 Misc. 705, 146 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1955 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/easley-v-new-york-state-thruway-authority-nysupct-1955.