Easley v. Elliott
43 Mo. 289
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The case was tried by consent of parties before the court, without the intervention of a jury. The court found a verdict for plaintiff, and rendered judgment thereon. No instructions or declarations of law were asked for or given on either side. There is no question of law presented or saved in a manner w'hich this court can review, and we will not undertake to weigh the evidence to determine whether it justified the finding of the trial court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Easley v. Elliott, 43 Mo. 289 (Mo. 1869).
43 Mo. 289 (Easley v. Elliott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Meridian Lumber Co. v. Lowry Lumber Co.
229 S.W. 267 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1921)
In re Assessment of Collateral Inheritance Tax in Estate of Lankford
197 S.W. 147 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1917)
Jordan v. Davis
72 S.W. 686 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1903)
Bozarth v. Lincoln Legion of Honor
67 S.W. 679 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1902)
Rice, Stix & Co. v. McClure & Harper
74 Mo. App. 383 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1898)
Riffe v. Wabash Railroad
72 Mo. App. 222 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1897)
Heidelback, Freidlander & Co. v. Cole
54 Mo. App. 138 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1893)
DeGiverville v. Legg
48 Mo. App. 573 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
Wenzell v. Erath
48 Mo. App. 476 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
Mead v. Spalding
94 Mo. 43 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1887)
Tyler v. Larimore
19 Mo. App. 445 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)
Miller v. Breneke
83 Mo. 163 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
Cunningham v. Snow
82 Mo. 587 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
Harrington v. Minor
80 Mo. 270 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
Henry v. Bell
75 Mo. 194 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1881)
Waddell v. Williams
50 Mo. 216 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1872)
Weilandy v. Lemuel
47 Mo. 322 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1871)