Easley v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Missouri

Easley v. Elliott

43 Mo. 289

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedFebruary 15, 1869

StatusPublished

Cited by17 cases

This text of 43 Mo. 289 (Easley v. Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Easley v. Elliott, 43 Mo. 289 (Mo. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The case was tried by consent of parties before the court, without the intervention of a jury. The court found a verdict for plaintiff, and rendered judgment thereon. No instructions or declarations of law were asked for or given on either side. There is no question of law presented or saved in a manner w'hich this court can review, and we will not undertake to weigh the evidence to determine whether it justified the finding of the trial court.

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The case was tried by consent of parties before the court, without the intervention of a jury. The court found a verdict for plaintiff, and rendered judgment thereon. No instructions or declarations of law were asked for or given on either side. There is no question of law presented or saved in a manner w'hich this court can review, and we will not undertake to weigh the evidence to determine whether it justified the finding of the trial court.

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 Mo. 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/easley-v-elliott-mo-1869.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack