Earvase v. State
This text of Earvase v. State (Earvase v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
MATTHEW EARVASE, § § No. 161, 2015 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Family Court of § the State of Delaware in and for v. § New Castle County § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 1306019886 § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: June 23, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015
O R D E R This 29"1 day of June 2015, it appears to the Court that, on June 4, 2015, the
Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice directing the appellant, Matthew Earvase, to Show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for Earvase’s failure to (i) file the opening brief and (ii) pay the Supreme Court filing fee in the absence of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Earvase has failed to respond to the notice to show cause and has neither filed the opening brief nor paid the filing fee. Under these circumstances, dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules
3(b)(2) and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Earvase v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earvase-v-state-del-2015.