Earth Energy Utility Corp. v. Doyle A. Revis Environmentally Engineered Equipment, Inc.

Opinion

I)ISMISS; Opinion tiled October 10, 2012

In The Q.tnirt uf pn1a1i fiftIi IhitricI uf !ixa it E1at1n No. 05-10-01610-CV

EARTH ENERGY UTILiTY CORPORATION, Appellant

V.

ENVIRONMENTALLY ENGINEERED EQUIPMENT, INC. AND DOYLE A. REVIS, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-09-08147

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Francis and Lang-Miers opinion By Chief Justice Wright

On June 4. 2012. the Court granted the agreed motion to withdraw filed by counsel for

appellant. We instructed appellant to notify this Court of the name, State Bar Number, address, and

telephone number of new counsel. By order dated June 28.2012. the Court granted appellant a forty-

five da extension of time to provide this Court with the information regarding new counsel. In that

order, the Court cautioned appellant that failure to provide the information regarding new counsel

within the time specified would result in dismissal of the appeal. As of today’s date, appellant has

not provided the requested information.

A corporation may only appear in this Court through counsel. See Kunstoplast ofAm., Inc. v. f’ortnosa Plastics Corp., 937 S.w2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1996) (per curiam). Appellant has failed to

notify the Court that it has retained counsel. For this reason, we dismiss the appeal. S’e Ttx. R.

j\ip P 4 3(c)

-r

CAROL ‘ WRICil-U CHIEI/4US1 fCf

10161 OF.P05 Qiiiirt uf pt’ra1 ifti! Iitrirt uf xzu at 1alla JUDGMENT P A R T II F N HRGY UTI FITY Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 CORPORATION. Appellant of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. CC-09- 08147). No. 05-10-01 61 0-CV V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Francis and Lang-Miers. ENVIRONMENTALLY ENGINEERED participating. EQUIPMENT, INC. ANI) DOYLE A. REVIS, Appellees

Based on the Courts opinion of this date. the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellees. Environmentally Engineered Equipment. Inc. and Doyle A. Revis, recover their costs of the appeal from appellant, Earth Energy Utility Corporation.

Judgment entered October 10, 2012.

CAROL’t N WRIGI IT 7 Cl lIEJflCI/