Earp v. Riley

1914 OK 12, 138 P. 164, 40 Okla. 340, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 23
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 13, 1914·No. 5766·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Secretary of State, denying protest of appellant against Referendum Petition No. 27, State Question No. 64. This ap *341 peal presents the same facts and the same questions of law presented' to this court and considered and determined in Ralls v. Wyand et al., ante, 138 Pac. 158. The propositions of law announced in that case govern and control the questions presented in this case; and upon the authority of that case the protest of appellant against said referendum petition must be and the same is hereby sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Earp v. Riley, 1914 OK 12, 138 P. 164, 40 Okla. 340, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 23 (Okla. 1914).

1914 OK 12 (Earp v. Riley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Uhlman v. Melton
401 P.2d 631 (Washington Supreme Court, 1965)
Kochen v. Young
107 N.W.2d 81 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1961)