Earnestine Bradford v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A
This text of Earnestine Bradford v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A (Earnestine Bradford v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 22, 2007.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-00922-CV
EARNESTINE H. BRADFORD, Appellant
V.
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A., Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 870284
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a default judgment signed October 4, 2006. The clerk=s record was filed on November 17, 2006. Appellant=s brief was due December 18, 2006, but was not filed.
On January 11, 2006, this Court issued an order stating that unless appellant submitted her brief, together with a motion reasonably explaining why the brief was late, on or before February 12, 2007, the Court would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellant filed no response.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed February 22, 2007.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Fowler and Edelman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Earnestine Bradford v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earnestine-bradford-v-citibank-south-dakota-na-texapp-2007.