Earnest Whitfield v. Secretary, DOC
This text of Earnest Whitfield v. Secretary, DOC (Earnest Whitfield v. Secretary, DOC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUG 10, 2010 JOHN LEY No. 08-16162 CLERK ________________________
D. C. Docket No. 07-01823-CV-JSM-MAP
EARNEST WHITFIELD,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondents-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________
(August 10, 2010)
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNTIED STATES
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, EDMONDSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. See Whitfield v.
McNeil, _ _ _ S. Ct. _ _ _ _, 2010 WL 2471069. We denied Petitioner’s
application for a Certificate of Appealability, relying on our decision in Holland v.
Florida, 539 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir. 2008). Then, the Supreme Court reversed our
judgment in Holland, and remanded that case for further consideration. Holland v.
Florida, 130 S. Ct. 2549 (2010). We therefore remand this case to the district court
for fact finding and further proceedings -- including, if it is necessary, an
evidentiary hearing -- consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion and judgment
in Holland.
REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Earnest Whitfield v. Secretary, DOC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earnest-whitfield-v-secretary-doc-ca11-2010.