Earnest James Cox v. United States
339 F.2d 604
Opinion
All of the matters raised in this ha-beas corpus proceedings are cognizable in the sentencing court on motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The trial Court correctly so held and its judgment is affirmed. See: Williams v. United States (10 CA), 323 F.2d 672.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Earnest James Cox v. United States, 339 F.2d 604 (10th Cir. 1965).
339 F.2d 604 (Earnest James Cox v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cleveland Roy Williams v. United States of America, Donald L. Davis v. United States of America, Christy Zoumah v. United States
323 F.2d 672 (Tenth Circuit, 1963)