Earnest Eugene Palmer v. State
This text of Earnest Eugene Palmer v. State (Earnest Eugene Palmer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-19-00177-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
EARNEST EUGENE PALMER, § APPEAL FROM THE 369TH APPELLANT
V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Earnest Eugene Palmer was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of an elderly/disabled person in January 2016. Appellant subsequently filed a post-conviction motion for discovery, which the trial court denied on April 22, 2019. Appellant, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the denial of his motion for discovery. On May 13, this Court notified Appellant that the information received failed to show the jurisdiction of the Court, i.e., the order being appealed is not an appealable order. We informed Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless the information was amended on or before June 12 to show this Court’s jurisdiction. This deadline passed without a response from Appellant. “[I]n Texas, appeals by either the State or the defendant in a criminal case are permitted only when they are specifically authorized by statute.” State ex rel. Lykos v. Fine, 330 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). There exists no statutory authority permitting an appeal from an order denying a postconviction motion for discovery. See Delgado-Gordon v. State, No. 07- 19-00189-CR, 2019 WL 2480047, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo June 13, 2019, no pet. h.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); see also Bibbs v. State, No. 02-18-00391-CR, 2018 WL 5832161, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Nov. 8, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Accordingly, we dismiss Appellant’s appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). Opinion delivered June 28, 2019. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
(DO NOT PUBLISH)
2 COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
JUNE 28, 2019
EARNEST EUGENE PALMER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Appeal from the 369th District Court of Cherokee County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 19103)
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that it is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Earnest Eugene Palmer v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earnest-eugene-palmer-v-state-texapp-2019.