Early v. Rossback

New York Court of Appeals

Early v. Rossback

726 N.E.2d 478, 94 N.Y.2d 869, 705 N.Y.S.2d 1, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 18

DecidedJanuary 6, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 726 N.E.2d 478 (Early v. Rossback) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Early v. Rossback, 726 N.E.2d 478, 94 N.Y.2d 869, 705 N.Y.S.2d 1, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 18 (N.Y. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal, insofar as taken against Wesley C. Ford and W. C. Ford Real Estate Corporation, dismissed as untimely (see, CPLR 5513 [a]); appeal, insofar as taken against Frank Ross-back and Frank Rossback Appraisal Service, dismissed to the extent that the appeal is from that part of the Appellate Division order that denied appellants’ motion to amend the complaint upon the ground that such portion of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the [870]*870meaning of the Constitution. As indicated in this Court’s order dated October 19, 1999 (94 NY2d 781), the appeal lies as of right only from so much of the Appellate Division order dated June 28, 1999, as granted the Rossback defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint as against those defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal, insofar as taken against Wesley C. Ford and W. C. Ford Real Estate Corporation, dismissed as untimely (see, CPLR 5513 [a]); appeal, insofar as taken against Frank Ross-back and Frank Rossback Appraisal Service, dismissed to the extent that the appeal is from that part of the Appellate Division order that denied appellants’ motion to amend the complaint upon the ground that such portion of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the [870]*870meaning of the Constitution. As indicated in this Court’s order dated October 19, 1999 (94 NY2d 781), the appeal lies as of right only from so much of the Appellate Division order dated June 28, 1999, as granted the Rossback defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint as against those defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

726 N.E.2d 478, 94 N.Y.2d 869, 705 N.Y.S.2d 1, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/early-v-rossback-ny-2000.