Early v. Mannix

15 Cal. 149
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1860·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Field, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Baldwin, J. and Cope, J. concurring.

In an action of forcible entry and detainer, tried in the County Court of Placer, upon an appeal from a Justice’s Court, the plaintiffs obtained a verdict from the jury, with an award of one hundred and fifty dollars as damages. The plaintiffs thereupon moved that the damages be trebled, under the statute. This motion the Court denied, and rendered judgment for the amount found by the jury, with restitution of the premises. The plaintiffs now apply for a writ of mandamus to compel the Court to render judgment for treble the damages.

The application must be denied. The plaintiffs have a speedy and an adequate remedy by appeal. If, upon the appeal, it shall be determined that the plaintiffs are entitled to a correction of the judgment, this Court can direct it to be made without ordering a new trial. In the mean time, the plaintiffs can enforce so much of the judgment as awards restitution of the premises.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Early v. Mannix, 15 Cal. 149 (Cal. 1860).

15 Cal. 149 (Early v. Mannix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Osborn v. Osborn
267 P.2d 333 (California Supreme Court, 1954)
G. Ganahl Lumber Co. v. Weinsveig
143 P. 1025 (California Supreme Court, 1914)
Chapman v. Hughes
58 P. 298 (California Supreme Court, 1901)