Earley v. DiCenso
400 U.S. 901, 91 S. Ct. 142
Opinion
Appeals from D. C. R. I. Probable jurisdiction noted. Cases consolidated and a total of 1% hours allotted for oral argument. Cases set for oral argument immediately following No. 89 [Lemon v. Kurtzman, probable jurisdiction noted, 397 U. S. 1034] and No. 153 [Tilton v. Finch, probable jurisdiction noted, 399 U. S. 904]. Reported below: 316 F. Supp. 112.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Earley v. DiCenso, 400 U.S. 901, 91 S. Ct. 142 (1970).
400 U.S. 901 (Earley v. DiCenso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DiCenso v. Robinson
316 F. Supp. 112 (D. Rhode Island, 1970)
Lemon v. Kurtzman
397 U.S. 1034 (Supreme Court, 1970)
Tilton v. Finch
399 U.S. 904 (Supreme Court, 1970)