Earley v. 1508 West Allegheny, Inc.
This text of 56 Pa. D. & C.2d 175 (Earley v. 1508 West Allegheny, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Circumstances
April 23,1969. Plaintiff filed a mechanic’s lien claim (later leave to amend was granted by Judge Greenberg).
March 6, 1970. Plaintiff then filed a complaint in mechanic’s lien.
May 28, 1970. Defendant’s preliminary objections were dismissed by Judge Hirsh, with leave to file an answer within 20 days.
June 17,1970. Defendant’s answer was filed.
June 22, 1970. The prothonotary, at plaintiff’s instance, entered judgment in default for want of an affidavit of defense. (Writ of execution issued August 5, 1970, subsequently stayed.)
August 17, 1970. Defendant files to me a petition to strike the judgment; the petition by order was granted; plaintiff files a petition to revoke my order granting the petition to strike the judgment; this was denied; plaintiff appeals.
Under the circumstances, I think it less labor to understand this matter if you let me put the matter the other way: Had I denied defendant’s petition to strike this hurried, arbitrary judgment, I would be unworthy of my own sense of judicial propriety and worthy of quick reversal by my appellate masters.
This judgment was conceived with unthinking, impolite hurry: I hope there still is such a moral thing as upright courtesy between lawyers which does not minimize the full and precise interest of a client. All that was needed here was an inquiry: “Do you intend to file an answer?”
[177]*177I took testimony here on the petition to vacate my order to strike and it was not difficult to reach the conclusion that plaintiff’s attorney was over quick, that our prothonotary was easy in error and that to strike the judgment was the only proper recourse of a proper discretion. He who reads the record will, I hope, think I was sharing a wise awareness in laying away the impact of lack of insight and of error.
A judgment is too dire to be gotten or allowed without better merit than here shown. Read discerning decision of Citizens National Bank of Evans City v. Rose Hill Cemetery Association of Butler, 218. Pa. Superior Ct. 366 (1971).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 Pa. D. & C.2d 175, 1971 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earley-v-1508-west-allegheny-inc-pactcomplphilad-1971.