Earles v. Gilham

Nevada Supreme Court

Earles v. Gilham

14 P. 588, 20 Nev. 49

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 5, 1887

DocketNo. 1256.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 14 P. 588 (Earles v. Gilham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Earles v. Gilham, 14 P. 588, 20 Nev. 49 (Neb. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Hawley, J.:

• The order of the district court, allowing an amendment to appellants’ motion for a new trial, having been reversed and set aside, upon an appeal taken, therefrom by defendant Gilham, (Earles v. Gilham, ante, 46,) it follows from that decision that there is no statement, on motion for a new trial herein, which can be considered by this court; and, as it is not claimed that there is any error in the- judgment roll, the judgment and order of the district court denying a new trial must be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Leonard, C. J., did not participate in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Hawley, J.:

• The order of the district court, allowing an amendment to appellants’ motion for a new trial, having been reversed and set aside, upon an appeal taken, therefrom by defendant Gilham, (Earles v. Gilham, ante, 46,) it follows from that decision that there is no statement, on motion for a new trial herein, which can be considered by this court; and, as it is not claimed that there is any error in the- judgment roll, the judgment and order of the district court denying a new trial must be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Leonard, C. J., did not participate in this decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 P. 588, 20 Nev. 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earles-v-gilham-nev-1887.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack