Earlene d.stowe v. Elliot l.richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
This text of 466 F.2d 510 (Earlene d.stowe v. Elliot l.richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant sought disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The district court affirmed the denial of relief by the Secretary. We find no error.
The pertinent findings of the Secretary were supported by substantial evidence, 42 U.S.C.A., section 405(g). There was no denial of procedural or substantive due process. There was no application of an incorrect legal standard. The report of the Vocational Rehabilitation expert was admissible under the teachings of Richardson v. Perales, 1971, 402 U.S. 389, 91 S.Ct. 1420, 28 L.Ed.2d 842.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
466 F.2d 510, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earlene-dstowe-v-elliot-lrichardson-secretary-of-health-education-and-ca5-1972.