Earlene Chambers v. City & County of Honolulu
407 P.2d 592, 49 Haw. 41
This text of 407 P.2d 592 (Earlene Chambers v. City & County of Honolulu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Earlene Chambers v. City & County of Honolulu, 407 P.2d 592, 49 Haw. 41 (haw 1965).
Opinion
The petition for rehearing is denied without argument.
Tsukiyama, C.J. and Wirtz, J. having dissented from the majority in the original opinion do not concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern Railroad
229 N.E.2d 504 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
407 P.2d 592, 49 Haw. 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earlene-chambers-v-city-county-of-honolulu-haw-1965.