Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Earle v. State

Earle v. State

851 So. 2d 742, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8779, 2003 WL 21349459
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 11, 2003
DocketNo. 4D02-4093
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 851 So. 2d 742 (Earle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Earle v. State, 851 So. 2d 742, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8779, 2003 WL 21349459 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Scott Earle challenges an order that denied his rule 3.850 motion for postcon-viction relief. We reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing to address Earle’s sentences in light of State v. Klayman, 835 So.2d 248 (Fla.2002); State v. Travis, 808 So.2d 194 (Fla.2002); Hayes v. State, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999); see also DeFreis v. State, 814 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). We find no error with the trial court’s disposition of Earle’s other claims.

POLEN, C.J., SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nichols v. State Farm Mut.
851 So. 2d 742 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
851 So. 2d 742, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8779, 2003 WL 21349459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earle-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.