Earle v. Rice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Earle v. Rice

259 A.D. 1014, 20 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7775

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 3, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 259 A.D. 1014 (Earle v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Earle v. Rice, 259 A.D. 1014, 20 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice, however, to a new action in the event that the Surrogate’s Court finally determines that it is without jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the proceeding there pending. We are of opinion that the Surrogate’s Court, in the discovery proceeding instituted by the plaintiff and now pending in the Surrogate’s Court of New York County, has competent jurisdiction to afford the plaintiff adequate relief, legal and equitable, and finally to dispose of all the issues between the parties presented by the complaint, and that that proceeding is a bar to this action. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice, however, to a new action in the event that the Surrogate’s Court finally determines that it is without jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the proceeding there pending. We are of opinion that the Surrogate’s Court, in the discovery proceeding instituted by the plaintiff and now pending in the Surrogate’s Court of New York County, has competent jurisdiction to afford the plaintiff adequate relief, legal and equitable, and finally to dispose of all the issues between the parties presented by the complaint, and that that proceeding is a bar to this action. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 1014, 20 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earle-v-rice-nyappdiv-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack