Earle v. King
92 A. 517, 112 Me. 561, 1914 Me. LEXIS 150
Opinion
Action on promissory note for $350, dated June 7,1913. Fred King, Jr., was defaulted. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, Fred King, and the plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial. Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Earle v. King, 92 A. 517, 112 Me. 561, 1914 Me. LEXIS 150 (Me. 1914).
92 A. 517 (Earle v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.