Earle v. King
92 A. 517, 112 Me. 561, 1914 Me. LEXIS 150
This text of 92 A. 517 (Earle v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Earle v. King, 92 A. 517, 112 Me. 561, 1914 Me. LEXIS 150 (Me. 1914).
Opinion
Action on promissory note for $350, dated June 7,1913. Fred King, Jr., was defaulted. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, Fred King, and the plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial. Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
92 A. 517, 112 Me. 561, 1914 Me. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earle-v-king-me-1914.