Earle v. Gillies

92 N.Y.S. 239
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 28, 1905·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment in favor of the defendant appears to have been rendered upon the theory that there had been a surrender and acceptance of the demised premises. No authority was shown, however, in the agent with whom the defendant had the negotiations, either to accept the surrender or to release the defendant. Such authority was necessary. Baylis v. Prentice, 75 N. Y. 604.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Earle v. Gillies, 92 N.Y.S. 239 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

92 N.Y.S. 239 (Earle v. Gillies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baylis v. . Prentice
75 N.Y. 604 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)