Earle v. Crosby

899 So. 2d 1150, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3579, 2005 WL 607884
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 17, 2005
DocketNo. 1D04-4127
StatusPublished

This text of 899 So. 2d 1150 (Earle v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Earle v. Crosby, 899 So. 2d 1150, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3579, 2005 WL 607884 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. See Brown v. Campion, 757 So.2d 535, 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (“[DJenying a plaintiffs request to proceed as indigent in a civil case does not result in irreparable harm which cannot be remedied on appeal and is therefore not reviewable by a writ of certiorari.”).

BENTON, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Campion
757 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
899 So. 2d 1150, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3579, 2005 WL 607884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earle-v-crosby-fladistctapp-2005.