Earle v. Art Library Pub. Co.
95 F. 544, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3172
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania·Decided June 30, 1899·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
I have considered carefully the reports, arguments, and testimony in this case, and am of opinion that the exceptions of Mr. McCartney, as administrator of William M. Singerly, must he overruled. I agree entirely with the learned master’s findings of fact, with the inferences of fact that he draws therefrom, and with his conclusions of law. It would he superfluous to restate what he has already put so convincingly, and accordingly I shall content myself with adopting his reports as the opinion of the court. The exceptions are dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Earle v. Art Library Pub. Co., 95 F. 544, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3172 (circtedpa 1899).
95 F. 544 (Earle v. Art Library Pub. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sargent v. Blake
160 F. 57 (Eighth Circuit, 1908)
Blake v. Sargent
152 F. 263 (D. Missouri, 1907)
Savings & Loan Soc. v. Davidson
97 F. 696 (Ninth Circuit, 1899)