Earle v. Art Library Pub. Co.
This text of 95 F. 544 (Earle v. Art Library Pub. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I have considered carefully the reports, arguments, and testimony in this case, and am of opinion that the exceptions of Mr. McCartney, as administrator of William M. Singerly, must he overruled. I agree entirely with the learned master’s findings of fact, with the inferences of fact that he draws therefrom, and with his conclusions of law. It would he superfluous to restate what he has already put so convincingly, and accordingly I shall content myself with adopting his reports as the opinion of the court. The exceptions are dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 F. 544, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earle-v-art-library-pub-co-circtedpa-1899.