Earle A. Daisley v. General Electric Company

865 F.2d 1257
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 31, 1989·No. 88-2110·Unpublished

Opinion

865 F.2d 1257

49 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 754

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Earle A. DAISLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 88-2110.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 1988.
Decided: Dec. 19, 1988.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 31, 1989.

Earle A. Daisley, appellant pro se.

Stanley Mazaroff (Venable, Baetjer & Howard), for appellee.

Before K.K. HALL and JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Earle A. Daisley appeals from the district court's order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Daisley v. General Electric Co., CA-84-3216 (D.Md. May 9, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Earle A. Daisley v. General Electric Company, 865 F.2d 1257 (4th Cir. 1989).

865 F.2d 1257 (Earle A. Daisley v. General Electric Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Locus v. Fayetteville State University
870 F.2d 655 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)