Earle A. Daisley v. General Electric Company
This text of 865 F.2d 1257 (Earle A. Daisley v. General Electric Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
865 F.2d 1257
49 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 754
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Earle A. DAISLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 88-2110.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 28, 1988.
Decided: Dec. 19, 1988.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 31, 1989.
Earle A. Daisley, appellant pro se.
Stanley Mazaroff (Venable, Baetjer & Howard), for appellee.
Before K.K. HALL and JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Earle A. Daisley appeals from the district court's order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Daisley v. General Electric Co., CA-84-3216 (D.Md. May 9, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
865 F.2d 1257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earle-a-daisley-v-general-electric-company-ca4-1989.