Earl Vonney Wade v. Lonnie Saunders, Warden Edward D. Carey, M.D. Pamela Ingram, R.N. Nelson W. Sours, Jr., Correctional Officer

Fourth Circuit

Earl Vonney Wade v. Lonnie Saunders, Warden Edward D. Carey, M.D. Pamela Ingram, R.N. Nelson W. Sours, Jr., Correctional Officer

60 F.3d 826, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24949

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 6, 1995

Docket7262

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 826 (Earl Vonney Wade v. Lonnie Saunders, Warden Edward D. Carey, M.D. Pamela Ingram, R.N. Nelson W. Sours, Jr., Correctional Officer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Earl Vonney Wade v. Lonnie Saunders, Warden Edward D. Carey, M.D. Pamela Ingram, R.N. Nelson W. Sours, Jr., Correctional Officer, 60 F.3d 826, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24949 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 826
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Earl Vonney WADE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Lonnie SAUNDERS, Warden; Edward D. Carey, M.D.; Pamela
Ingram, R.N.; Nelson W. Sours, Jr., Correctional
Officer, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94 7262.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 11, 1995.
Decided: July 6, 1995.

Earl Vonney Wade, appellant pro se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA; Colin James Steuart Thomas, Jr., Timberlake, Smith, Thomas & Moses, P.C., Staunton, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wade v. Saunders, No. CA-93-194 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 826
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Earl Vonney WADE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Lonnie SAUNDERS, Warden; Edward D. Carey, M.D.; Pamela
Ingram, R.N.; Nelson W. Sours, Jr., Correctional
Officer, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94 7262.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 11, 1995.
Decided: July 6, 1995.

Earl Vonney Wade, appellant pro se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA; Colin James Steuart Thomas, Jr., Timberlake, Smith, Thomas & Moses, P.C., Staunton, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wade v. Saunders, No. CA-93-194 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 826, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earl-vonney-wade-v-lonnie-saunders-warden-edward-d-ca4-1995.