Earl v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Earl v. United States

678 F. App'x 99

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2017·No. No. 16-1734·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Earl appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Government on his action under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Earl v. United States, No. 5:14-cv-00115-F, 2016 WL 3080791 (E.D.N.C. May 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Earl appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Government on his action under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Earl v. United States, No. 5:14-cv-00115-F, 2016 WL 3080791 (E.D.N.C. May 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Earl v. United States, 678 F. App'x 99 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

678 F. App'x 99 (Earl v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.